The Rejection of ...  

womanoirish 55F
346 posts
12/30/2005 10:24 pm

Last Read:
3/5/2006 9:27 pm

The Rejection of ...

The initial email
Sender BJRex2
To womanoirish
Slainte! Would luv to see your face, as you can see ours. Although I must admit, my hair is actually a bit lighter and definitely curlier than the photo shows. And my hubby is actually taller than he appears in the photo (damn higher female shoes! lol). Look us over. We tend to be rather blunt, and many times painfully honest, but rather that than play socially nice and lie to your face!

The Response
Sender womanoirish
To BJRex2
Thank you for your email. Unfortunately, I don't think we're a match. Take care and have a safe & happy new year.

The Nasty Email
Sender BJRex2
To womanoirish
Thank you for your email and rather odd face pic.....Why send a face pic if you decided that we are not a match? Are you a game player?

We have noticed that a lot of the women on this site are seldom ACTUALLY looking for what they SAY they are looking for, but are merely dabblers, who wear the badge of liberation and lifestyle but have not actually lived it.

We are not being bitter, and we can handle rejection, but you, after looking at your picture, we are clearly NOT in the lower level that you are in, in looks that is, why would you reject us other than you are NOT real in the lifestyle? We think you should reconsider your dabbling and fake lifestyle playing and move to a dating site. Sorry if this is so UP FRONT and offensive, but honey, you need to see reality the way it IS. Happy Hunting! Although, with this game playing, good luck with that!

And since any response emails from me are blocked - gee don't you just love people who dump shit and then run like cowards? - here's my response

Face pictures are attached to my responses because in my profile I say I will send a face picture.

As far as your response to my disinterest, 1)I have every right to respond to any email with a polite "no thank you" 2) your accusations are unfounded, unwelcome, and childish, 3)your rudeness is far uglier than my face.

Looks and fucking are not everything. Manners and graciousness count, too. If I had any doubts about my rejection of you (that you very obviously CANNOT handle) your response removed it.

Was I right earlier? Is this not Porky's????

BJRex2 56M/51F

12/31/2005 5:47 pm

Although we know that this comment will likely be deleted, and we are not sophmorish enough nor want to spend any more time to get into a blog war with you, you obviously did not read our initial email critically enough to notice that we warned you that we were "blunt" and "sometimes painfully honest," and that we do not play social niceties that amount to lying to people.

You misunderstood our honesty for rudeness. We could have lied and told you that you are attractive to us -- would us lying to you make you feel better?

You are blocked because we block those we believe are fakes, flakes or dabblers. We repeat it again here: if you think that this site is so terrible as your "Porky's" blog portrays, then why are you here? Unless you are a fake, flake or dabbler in the Lifestyle. And it is those who ARE fakes, flakes and dabblers who tend to ruin it for the rest of us REAL Lifestyle people. We have to continually sift through the nonsense of the game players, and that gets REALLY old after a while. Hence, our rather blunt responses to all of those who are suspect.

If you are offended that we thought you were not as attractive as we would prefer, then you are offended more by the truth than with the alleged rudeness. Again, we could have lied, if that would have soothed you in some way. But that is not our way of doing things. Especially in the Lifestyle.

And by the way ... you did not read OUR blog critically enough as well. We were annoyed with those women who do NOT respond AT ALL, which you must admit, IS rude. You may not like our response to you simply because it states rather up front, and blunt truths. But again, we would prefer not to lie to people.

Nonetheless, we actually wish you well with whatever the heck you are doing here, and hopefully you will find whatever the heck it is you are looking for here on a sex and Lifestyle website. Ciao!

womanoirish 55F

1/1/2006 12:39 am

No, I wouldn't delete this comment for all the tea in China. You make unwarrented accusations against people whom you do not even know. I stand in awe of your delusions.

RailBaron2 55M

1/1/2006 8:03 pm

Happy New Year WomanO'Irish, I saw your pic on a blog you reswpondedto & stopped by to say hello. I am a standard member & cannot read your profile. Please feel free to stop by my blog anytime.
May the new year bring all that you seek. sincerly, Jim A.K.A. RailBaron2

heresyourdaddy1 63M
1 post
1/5/2006 12:58 pm

Just an observation... but if I'm going to stick my dick out there (meant to be figuritive but also applies literally) for all to see, to offer to bare one's self and all that goes with it, I think I would appreciate a little tact. What is being passed as "blunt" and "painfully honest" is just painfully rude, childish and mean.
The lady said "no" in a kind manner. End of story. But the response to be so ill-willed takes an element of contentment out of the equation. If I am to encounter your wrath because I choose not to choose you, well, I am inclined to pass.
Someone that sees themselves as some kind of caretaker for the "Lifestyle" needs to takes a closer look at themselves. (By the way... Who put you in charge?")

gnr8nrg 47M

1/6/2006 2:55 pm

Very interesting. I didn't know the "Lifestyle" had so much drama.

MissAnnThrope 57F
11488 posts
1/6/2006 3:38 pm

You know, this is why I send no response to anyone who doesn't interest me, in general. A polite no thank you gets you flamed by some air thief who is offended that you don't want to fall on his dick. Or, they consider any response encouragement and keep writing. You wrote back, after all, that no thank you can be worn down into a do me baby.

The other night, I broke my own rule and sent one of the quick responses to someone who if he looked at the Xes in the compatability chart would have seen I had no interest. I sent back the quick response of, "I don't think the chemistry is there." Big mistake. He kept at me. How do I know the chemistry isn't there if I don't meet him and have sex wiht him? There is no quick response of, "You're not my type." So, I sent back, "I think we're looking for different things." Nope. That wasn't good enough either. After all, we're all looking for sex, right? So I stopped trying. Way too many are thick in the head and take any response as encouragement. Or get nasty when you do say no thank you.

So from now on, I'm sticking to my policy of not responding to men who don't interest me. They can call me a phony, a fake, a dabbler, but you know what? I don't care. I don't need idiots who are bitter that I have no interest in fucking them. And yes, what you got was a very bitter response.

Become a member to create a blog