Profiles with no pictures  

vengeur 41M
565 posts
2/26/2005 9:34 am

Last Read:
3/5/2006 9:27 pm

Profiles with no pictures

I wish there were not so many profiles without pictures on this site, especially with the standard profiles. It's just too easy to create a profile for insincerity's sake, dishonest purposes, or other forms of time-wasting nonsense. Nobody said the picture(s) had to show your face, you being naked, or you engaged in sexual activity, either.

The reasons people give for not posting even one picture or having one to send don't wash with me, either.

No scanner or digital camera? Do what I once did - go to a store that provides picture scanning as a service. It's not that expensive, either. A camera shop that I phoned in Manhattan, New York, about the most expensive place to live in that I know of, told me they could scan up to 15 pictures and put it on a CD-ROM for under 20 bucks. One could easily spend more than that getting a few sheets of wallet-sized film prints made.

You have a high profile job? For the most part, I would argue that people who say that might just be a little too pretentious or full of themselves. Even if such a claim has some merit, there are still many ways to post a picture of yourself without anybody you work with possibly discovering your precious little secret. Some techniques would be to wear a mask or hat with a brim in your picture, obscure your face with photo editing software, or just have the picture show something other than your face. Just use your imagination and your wits.

You're married and trying to be discreet? Well, do you really think your spouse will be able to recognize you by a picture of any part of your body that could be possibly photographed by you? Unless that part of you is distinctively tattooed or bar-coded, I would say nobody is that keenly perceptive, even spouses who've been married to you for many years. Besides, the phrase “plausible deniability” could come into play here. It has worked for certain agencies of national government quite well in the past, and it can work for you too.

You're afraid somebody will digitally alter your picture so as make somebody else's head appear to be on your body, so that they can then put it on a pornographic website? I have only heard this excuse once before. It came from the mouth of a woman whom I would assert is certifiably paranoid schizophrenic. I made the unfortunate mistake of agreeing to meet her too, but that is a whole other story altogether. So get over yourself if you try saying this one to me. There are already plenty enough willing people in this world to pose for pornography pictures. There is simply no need for anybody to go to the trouble of using a picture of your body for such purposes or any other, you wacko! Now, go take your Zyprexin or whatever medication you are supposed to be on, and shut up.

I once received pictures on this site from a girl living in Cuba, the worker’s “paradise”. If somebody such as her, living in perhaps the poorest and most oppressive gulag-style dictatorship ever known, can send me a picture of herself through this site, anybody else could too. So spare me your poverty excuses, please. I’m sure that girl did not make any, although I’m afraid she may have been arrested for going online when Fidel Castro cracked down on such activities not long after she contacted me.


LVsinner04 30F

2/26/2005 9:50 am

wow, you are pretty pissed at people without pictures. i guess that includes me. i don't have one up because i don't want to. if someone asks for it, i have it but i just don't want anyone seeing me. that my excuse and that's not on your list. maybe you should add it.


papyrina 51F
21133 posts
2/26/2005 11:48 am

i agree with you to a certain degree,has pics in profile and network but once some one sent me mail with my pic doctored as in pornografic shots,not nice at all and quite a shock,so don't be too quick to judge


I'm a

and
i'm here to stay


LustGoddess2469 50F  
2453 posts
2/26/2005 12:51 pm

Perfect! I couldn't have said it better myself.

Lusty


vengeur 41M
836 posts
2/26/2005 3:38 pm

LVsinner04, you are within your rights to not post your picture(s) on your profile because you would rather not. That is perfectly fine with me. However, for all you know, there might already be some really great guy for you on this site who decided to not contact you because he did not see any pictures on your profile, so he contacted another girl with a picture on her profile instead. (This goes along with why most people do not prefer to go on "blind dates" if they can avoid it.) Seeing is believing. Nobody is going to really know how sexy, cute, or even real you are just because your profile's words claim such things. I've seen profiles on this site with pictures of just women's legs, ankles, or feet. I would sooner send a message to a profile like that than one with just a few words. To me, any kind of a picture on a profile means something, even if it does not show much.

Hey papyrina, I am sorry to hear that somebody decided to be play head games with you like that, but I seriously doubt they did it for the purposes of making a pornographic site like the woman I previously mentioned. She tried to tell me how much it happens, but I knew it was her paranoia making her say that. She was so damned paranoid, she even insisted that I erase a digital picture that I took of her sitting across from me at the restaurant we went to on my date from Hell with her. Besides, her body was nowhere nearly as sexy as yours seems to be, so that is why I laughed at the notion of anybody actually getting a cheap thrill from an image of her fully clothed body. Trust me, this woman was a total fruitcake. She even called me about 100 times over a five month period after this date, asking for another date, despite the fact that she acted like a total bitch to me during most parts of this one and only date that we had.

LustGoddess2469, thanks for concurring here with me. I think your pictures are great too, since they got my cock very hard.


vengeur 41M
836 posts
2/27/2005 7:34 am

sexyfitwoman, I would have to agree with you about how much attention women get on this site. I guess that is because of the disproportionate male to female ratio - 16 to 1 is my estimate.


femaleinnyc 54F
82 posts
3/9/2005 7:19 pm

Thank you Vengeur for your post. I agree with you 100%.
Female{=}


vengeur 41M
836 posts
3/10/2005 3:39 am

femaleinnyc, thank you for your support!


rm_sassysara33 45F

3/14/2005 7:02 pm

vengeur ..I agree about pictures on profile somewhat..I do have pictures but they are in my network..I feel if I want someone to know what I look like I will sent them a invite..lol..and I must say I really enjoy seeing your pictures..."yummy"..lol


vengeur 41M
836 posts
3/15/2005 7:43 pm

sassysara33, I am glad that you like my pictures. I have respect for a girl who at least has pictures in her network album. I have a network album myself, with 30 pictures within it. Would you like access to it?


Become a member to create a blog