Things overheard....  

stuckinks5 43M
369 posts
3/9/2006 6:36 pm

Last Read:
3/13/2006 2:17 pm

Things overheard....


Eating out on the good ole expense account and a couple of women at the table next to mine were talking about one's date the other night and she is talking about how lousy this guy was in bed. Of course that registered a thought in my head. I can honestly say that I have never had a lousy time in bed with someone. Now some weren't great, obviously some will be better than others, but I have never been in a situation where all I wanted to do was get it done and leave. I know that an unresponsive woman would probably cause me to want to categorize the experience as lousy. What is you definition of a lousy "fuck"?

MissKittyNip26 105F

3/9/2006 8:24 pm

Yeh.. lousy to me would be someone unresponsive.. a guy that just laid there, while I did all the work, yet got no reaction from him. That's never happened.. thankfully! Now.. I have had other issues, such as size problems, stamina problems, technique problems, etc... BUT, I can always find SOME sort of enjoyment.. whether it be the kisses, the "talk", the other talents, etc. AND, I can always at least attain an orgasm, which I just bring on myself. IMO, it takes 2 people to make a "lousy fuck".. and I know I'm not lousy.. so, it'll never happen!


stuckinks5 43M
169 posts
3/10/2006 1:54 pm

Very good point MKN, it always takes two to tango.


ediesedgewick 57F

3/12/2006 7:22 pm

Lousy can be a guy who doesn't know what to do with his tongue. Or who isn't confident. Or who lacks creativity. I think you can tell with the kiss though--I've kissed some really lousy kissers, and I cut it off there. But I've never had a lousy time in bed either. Maybe we're good at weeding?


Become a member to create a blog