Kelli's first poll - should I ban this asshole?  

rm_kelli4u2dew 41F
7027 posts
4/20/2006 7:50 pm

Last Read:
5/2/2006 9:43 am

Kelli's first poll - should I ban this asshole?

Please see my post Couples below. Please read all of the comments, especially those on the second page.

Normally, this is a free speech zone. Although I normally don't post anything controversial, I am not shy about voicing my opinion, either here or in comments on others' blogs. I welcome intelligent discourse, and (intelligent) people who disagree with me normally teach me a lot more than people who have no opinions of their own.

There has been a blogger who has been spamming people's posts to draw attention to his own blog. I'm sure you've seen it, as he has spammed most of the top 100, if not all. I politely asked him to stop. Instead, he wants to argue and insinuate that I'm a bitch for objecting to his objectionable behavior.

Understand, it is the spam that I opject to. I have read the posts he thinks EVERYONE in the blogosphere should read, and they are well written, if a bit windy. I'm sure many people enjoyed them, and I might have enjoyed them more if he hadn't decided to be such an ASSHOLE.

So, here's my poll question (since I am a believer to the core in democracy):

Should I ban this asshole, or just put up with his spam and ignore him and let the market decide if he deserves to be intrusive and rude?
Should I ban the argumentative spammer to keep him from disrupting my blog?
Should I ignore the jerk and just pretend that he's not using my blog for his self promotion?
Should I let "the market" decide whether he survives here or not?
Should I report his obnoxious behavior?
Should I show another picture of my ass?
Ridiculing him is probably punishment enough and he'll probably leave me alone after this.
If I offer a blow job as a reward, will you beat him up for me?
Do you agree that beauty is only skin deep, but stupid goes clear to the bone?
None of the above ... (must leave comment as to your opinion)
All of the above, and consign him to eternal blue balls.


whats4dessert2 49M

4/20/2006 8:44 pm

I voted for ban him but that was only because I didn't read far enough. Another pic of your ass would most certainly have been the clear victor. The stupid going to the bone would have come up a close third


rm_saintlianna 45F
15466 posts
4/20/2006 8:48 pm

Uh............ban him and be done with it. Time is short and so is my attention span.


frogger1995 39F

4/20/2006 9:08 pm

I of course went for the "Show us another pic of your ass Kelli!!!!"

But it's up to you. I have had a TON of spammers. I have never deleted a post but I have banned one Adult Friend. Only because we went on a VERY bad date and he threatened to do all sorts of mean stuff like expose information about me in my blog.

It's your blog and if you don't like it ban him. Personally some things transcend the Free Speech Policy we should all hold to. But you are right when you say that the market will judge.. On the other hand...more comments push you up the list!


blueguy1051 60M

4/20/2006 9:27 pm

I agree with Frogger ...


rm_macallan4u 46M
968 posts
4/20/2006 9:36 pm

This is a question for the ages.. After much contemplation I think the solution is twofold. Firstly, you must show another pic of your ass. Should said tactic fail to produce satisfactory results, beating him up would be the only option. But how would one such as yourself find someone to do your bidding? Not an easy task I'm sure, but your suggestion is a good start!

... let the market decide sweetness.


wistfuljester 64M

4/20/2006 9:44 pm

I picked none of the above for one simple reason: I would have just deleted and banned him, and never have said a word about it...


SlowPlayin 50M

4/20/2006 9:44 pm

Kelli,
I voted to ban ... who needs to put up with the disruption. The trouble is that this particular "member" has multiple profiles ... one of which I banned this afternoon from my blog. I'm not sure how to stop it completely but the objective of this person seems be to vandalize and to disrupt.

I messaged you with an observation about this person/blogger. Sadly, this is giving him the attention he has admittedly craved.
SP


Nightguy_1961 55M
4866 posts
4/20/2006 9:52 pm

I voted to report him, though the offer for beating him up was very tempting, my dear...*chuckling*

NG61...leaving behind a single red rose tied in black silk ribbon for a lovely young lady


JudeL5 46M
1535 posts
4/20/2006 10:02 pm

I voted for your cute butt.... 'cause it REALLY is!!!

This guy is being resourcful and "just following" a tried and try method of marketing... not unlike Coke putting ads on Monday night football... but when it comes from an individual, it seems more annoying than when we put up with it from a corporation....

I think he'll go away if we ignore him... but your cute butt... well I hope it doesn't go away for quite a while LOL

TTFN
Jude


rm_bk2nrml 57M

4/20/2006 10:06 pm

put his ass on the road !

a.j.


Wordsmith2004 36M
7233 posts
4/20/2006 10:11 pm

an ass for an ass, gets my vote! lol

Now I'm not actually sure what you mean by spam....if we're talkng about a single small link to his post at the bottom of his one relevant comment to your post, then I see nothing wrong with that...

it makes it more convient for people to come directly to the post you want them to read, but if he posts it like 3, 4, or 50 times on the same blog page....well then that's muy retardo in my humble opinion

Conserve Water and Prevent Global Warming: Shower With A MILF!


reverend21 49M
1913 posts
4/21/2006 12:01 am

Report him, ban him, and post a new ass picture, people that take time to spread their issues using your space, inconsiderate and disrespectful.


curious082385 31F
4925 posts
4/21/2006 2:20 am

I say to just delete his comments or ignore him. Any reaction on your part gives him the attention that he is looking for and dosen't give him reason to stop.
He's done the same on my blog and it drives me nuts. I just delete and ignore.


VATraveler1948 68M

4/21/2006 3:57 am

I know the spam you are referring to, it clearly points out that the spammer is a few fries short of a happy meal. It's annoying but it really is harmless. I think the trick is just ignoring the guy, don't respond or even acknowledge his "contributions" to your blog.

I strongly believe in anything that will beautify blogland and improve the environment... so I voted for the new picture of your butt.


EroticaXTC 49F

4/21/2006 5:19 am

I voted "all of the above",
(he pimped himself out everywhere)


rm_kelli4u2dew replies on 4/23/2006 9:04 pm:
God! I love your pics! {=}

rm_jumon0074 42M
18 posts
4/21/2006 5:35 am

Although I vote for ignore the jerk and just pretend that he's not using your blog.
I would rather suggest you to keep an eye on him and check which part of your blog been used and mention it on your next blog as a note.
If you delete he will try others
If you show him your ass he will do it again to see your beautifull ass again.
If you beat him up I think from hospital bed he will copy you
thats all my suggestion


Cowboy_Deluxe 38M

4/21/2006 5:42 am

What do you want to do about it? Do that.


sugarbabyhhh 43F

4/21/2006 6:03 am

love your ass.


phangasm2003 105M

4/21/2006 6:26 am

That was a hard decision. That BJ is mighty tempting, but on the other hand if every willing guy took you up on that, you'd have a very sore mouth and Mr. Spam would be in a full body cast. I thought about reporting him, but aside from being obnoxious, he's pretty harmless. If you ban him, it removes the spam... hmm. I voted that way at first, and then decided I'm going to go with the non-violent option instead. It doesn't look like the first vote took, but who knows, I may have caused a ballot box controversy here. Call me "Hanging Chad"...


TabithaElectra79 37F

4/21/2006 8:09 am

I'd ban him, he had his chance!


muscles4u2have 54M
1642 posts
4/21/2006 8:27 am

I was going to vote for banning him!! But you had to put that in about another picture of your ass!! You know men are going to vote for another picture of your ass!!!


rm_FreeLove999 46F
16127 posts
4/21/2006 8:37 am

he spammed me too. on principle, i won't follow links to the blogs of spammers. i don't reply either. if people want to get my attention, they need to take the time to read my blog and respond to what it says (without being offensive). then i will make every effort to make a return visit.

he may think this is the right way to attract attention, but i think most are not fooled by it!

i didn't ban him, i just ignored him. but i read his further comments on your blog... maybe u should ban him.



[blog freelove999]


rm_kelli4u2dew replies on 4/22/2006 8:38 pm:
It was the further comments that prompted this poll. The spam was one thing. Being rude and argumentative is another.

hansum_strangrr 47M
384 posts
4/21/2006 8:42 am

I think you should delete his comments and ban his sorry ass, but as I read further... I would dearly love to beat him to a bloody pulp if your offer is still good. Now do you want his body found or never found?

Everybody Dies, Not Everyone Really Lives.


sillyperv 54M

4/21/2006 9:51 am

Ban, blog and flog at will. First, he has no right to complain about how you handle your space. Second, he's distracting your attention from ME! That alone ------


DLiscious2 48M/42F

4/21/2006 10:24 am

Sure, ban him, that's what that capability is for. Why put up with hassle when you don't have to?

Okay, that said...YES, more rear-view pics! And for a bj...uh, you probably could get more than you are asking.


jd29992z 54M
3888 posts
4/21/2006 10:35 am

Ban him if you can't get people to read your blog for what you write and the content then you don't need to be pestering people to read it. Oh and by the way you have a great ass!!!!!!


fmisvme 46M/36F

4/21/2006 1:05 pm

Ban him first...then put up more pics...then come to Kansas City Fun blog we'll be back!!!
M&C


Rock Chalk Jayhawk!


NSAAddict 42F

4/21/2006 3:00 pm

lol, love your choices I'd ban him if he comes back again, you're right he wa rude to you and you definitely don't need to take that shit on your own blog, kick him to the curb Kelli!


kelly402005 52F

4/21/2006 3:41 pm

I banned him........
I think he's under another name now...... kawinkeng
Beware!!!
He's already attacked me again!!


I'll wait to see what he says to my reply......
See what happens post that.

Have a one kelli,
kel


ken20101963 53M  
48 posts
4/21/2006 7:03 pm

If he upset you so much, then yes, Ban Him. You have rights. As we all do.


tillerbabe 55F

4/21/2006 10:54 pm

Kelli - just ban him....no drama, he's gone! And I know who you are talking about - he's irritating the "fuc outta" me!!! So, I'll "ban him' if you will..and then maybe everyone will... Deal? Or NO DEAL? LOL!


rm_kelli4u2dew replies on 4/22/2006 8:41 pm:
LOL! The votes right now say to ban him. So ... Deal!!!

sassybelle21 32F
13313 posts
4/22/2006 12:11 am

Kelli I banned this dude a long time ago. I mean he said nothing concerning my post and simply leave a comment to just promote his blog. Well I'm sorry but on my blog, the limelight is all mine and I don't share too well. In all honesty, I don't like people who promote their blogs on mine without asking for my permission or whatsoever. Since he's being such a moron, I'd say ban him.


rm_xxxtheline 53M

4/22/2006 3:50 am

Show your ass please,
Ban him,
Show your beautiful ass again,
Report him,
Show your ass again,
Repeat...

Everybody Ban him,
Let's make a party of it!


beatpoeme 53M

4/22/2006 7:30 am

You should do what you feel is right. The court of public opinion has its day but in the end it’s becomes a Henry Miller novel. Follow your heart even in this case. It works even when the matters are not of the heart. I followed a few threads of this dude when he first started to post these weird (to me!!) posts and hounded some of my mates here. I was curious though. I’m a student of Ayn Rand and take a pro active approach to societal contribution even in a closed system. I saw there was no real content. Though literarily accurate and full of intention I found them full of pretense and frippery. I posted a few comments and never returned. Everyone is entitled to their say in a free society. I take things to seriously here at times and get carried away. We are all avatars in way shape or form here. We all crave attention, for creative purposes or sex. As the spammers and cammers do. A few times I put a few noses out of joint.I just want to post poetry and art work and try to ignore the politics. I think we should push for this verification process to be mandatory.

Beatpoeme
On your bike.


rm_Silverlockak 56M

4/22/2006 7:42 am

My vote was to ban him. I am new to this group and prefer reading material that is along the same line as what started the discussion.


DrLoveEsoterica 62M
219 posts
4/22/2006 8:48 am

Kelli, I'm not much of a talker but I enjoy reading your blog every chance I get. My first vote was to ban him . . . then I kept reading and voted for another picture of your beautiful ass . . . then (you guessed it), I read the option for the blow job . . . I ended up voting for a new ass pic because I didn't think we'd ever have the chance to meet . . . but OH HOW TEMPTING you are. I hope the asshole stops . . . but if not, just know that I'm willing to change my vote. Keep us posted.

Doc


DrLoveEsoterica 62M
219 posts
4/22/2006 9:02 am

. . . Another possibility . . . Would you consider making your voting options more "mutually exclusive"? If, so, I'd vote for banning him, posting another picture of your ass for us to see . . . AND I'd be happy to beat the fucker up for nothing . . . but would, of course, accept your offer of the blow job out of respect.


RevJoseyWales 69M/66F
14393 posts
4/22/2006 10:16 am

yeah, I thought you were referring to him. Now I really feel bad, he's never spammed me. It might be FUN to see what would happen if he wanderded down Copperhead Road.

Basically I think he's a harmless jackoff, very intelligent but lacking in manners and good taste, and in quite desparate need of attention.

I voted for all of the above, because you offered such eniticing options. Reporting him would bre futile, because just bign a pain in the ass isn't against guidelines. Just ban his obnoxious ass. Hell, for you, I'll set the dogs on him gratis, you don't even have to offer a BJ (Altough the thought is indeed awesome) Joe

"McVeigh had the right idea, wrong address."

"This ain't Dodge City, and you ain't Bill Hickok."


RevJoseyWales 69M/66F
14393 posts
4/22/2006 1:07 pm

By the way, I dropped by his place and left a comment (printable) for him. Haven't seen his woeful ass up the clamshell yet. Hopin' he does show up, my meds aren't working right, and the dogs are gettin' hungry. I'm just sittin and waitin', playing with my whetstone and strop. Happy to be of service. Joe

"McVeigh had the right idea, wrong address."

"This ain't Dodge City, and you ain't Bill Hickok."


Allsleeky 35F

4/22/2006 1:47 pm

I've seen it on my blog too, but so far he hasn't said anything to offend me like he did to you! When he does I'll simply delete his comments, I think he'll get the message, if not then I'll ban him. But I voted for another pic of your sweet looking ass!


rm_ENGBUCARO 38M
596 posts
4/22/2006 7:30 pm

Hey its your blog .... think of it as a digital gate to your
virtual personality.

AdultFriendFinder gave you the means to close that gate to whoever you want, no explanations required.

So if he is not welcome, and you politely told him to keep away and he didn't listen, Exercise your right and ban him.

Reporting him its a different story.

PS: Read/comment/vote on my blog ... I like when people reciprocate


beatpoeme 53M

4/23/2006 12:29 am

This is a community of sorts here and it can take time for the myriad of opinions and responses to filter through.
I recently had an incident where a member banned me from their site, I was having a little fun at his expenses but went a little to far I admit.
What I find unusual is that he decided to slander me by leaving his pompous responses to my silly comments on his blog but removed my portion of the discourse Therefore leaving the impression that only his opinion is valid.
His blog now slanders the authenticity of my profile and character and casts doubt on the validity of my opinion. by selectively allowing his portion of the discourse while omitting my own.
I can respect the fact that one has the right to do what they see fit with their own blog even when it is callous and defensive. But to omit the balanced portion of an argument or interaction is censorship in its purist form. By the way this is not the kind of attention I had in mind. The people here who I directly interact with on a personal level have seen me and know these words are true an posted accordingly on my blog. By the way since he was the first one to take this exchange to the greater community. I apologize to Kelly4U2dew that he needed to use this post as a soap box for his belligerent accusations in order to draw attention to himself. I just want post me poetry receive some constructive criticism here and there and make a quip or too. Some dudes are just toooooooo serious in a mid west kinda way.

Update
It now appears that this memeber has began a E-mail campaign with women I correspond with. They have told me that he is attemtpting to endorse his oppinoin and handling of me while making himself look concerned and informed. This propaganda of his only reinforces the reality that he really may not be the person he alludes to be.

Beatpoeme


EverReady343 47M

4/23/2006 9:42 am

    Quoting curious082385:
    I say to just delete his comments or ignore him. Any reaction on your part gives him the attention that he is looking for and dosen't give him reason to stop.
    He's done the same on my blog and it drives me nuts. I just delete and ignore.
I agree with curious. He will probably get bored and leave after
awhile.
I like that pic of your ass!
But I'd love to see an other one!


beatpoeme 53M

4/23/2006 6:10 pm

Kelly.
Your post and poll has brought a lot of sentiment out of the woodwork. Looks like in my case the dude who was on my back pulled his remarks from his blog that omitted my portion of the discourse. I'm fine with that. I just wish he didn't start this propaganda e-mail campaign to my lady friends.That is very un gentleman like, and I know he thinks hes one. Two steps forward one step back.

thanks for the heads up.

Next subject.


1niteluvr33 44M

4/23/2006 11:43 pm

I'd be happy to beat his ass for you, with or without the reward....although, I'd be happy to get the reward too!

Love your ass!


danteszippo 52M
3873 posts
4/24/2006 2:20 am

what a great ass. inspiring.


bigboy1169322 37M
15 posts
4/24/2006 11:33 am

Ban the cocknoy


slave591 51M

4/25/2006 8:58 am

I dont know what happened but no one deserves to be treated bad. If you feel that bad about what he did then you are in your right to get rid of him.this is a sex site not an asshole site.


slave591 51M

4/25/2006 9:04 am

you deserve the best.this person should be dropped.


sexyboytoy2283 33M

4/26/2006 8:49 pm

This dude sounds like a real prick if I were you I would kick him were the sun does not shine,Kelli!


looking4funlovn2 52M

5/2/2006 6:32 am

Here's one to think about!

Report the obnoxious behavior, Then ban him, Send me another picture of your ass, give me the blowjob before I kick his ass, then, if I servive, let me give you head as a reward.

Beauty is only skin deep and ugly does go to the bone. It's the finding out which is which that makes life exciting!


Become a member to create a blog