what a HUGE cock!!!  

mundarikos 40M
392 posts
5/24/2006 4:31 am
what a HUGE cock!!!

If youre an Amerian AND you blindly support GWB, cant take criticism or think i am some sort of foolish fuckwit flustered by folly then please stop reading now.

Yep, hes been at it again... a new Bushism is born every minute! however, this time i suspect a more sinister motive for the whole new noun GW came up with yesterday, one thats not related to his mind numbing and frequently demonstrated stupidity...

the new word:
Suiciders...

yep, for the first time,yesterday, i watched GW deliver to the world a new noun. here are some quotes (taken form the whitehouse website and the transcript of yesterdays press conference held with the Israeli Prime minister)

"It is dangerous in Iraq because there are some who believe that we're soft, that the will of the United States can be shaken by suiciders -- and suiciders who are willing to drive up to a Red Cross center, a center of international help and aid and comfort, and just kill. "

and a little later:
"The tactics to respond to more suiciders driving cars will alter on the ground; more checkpoints, whatever they decide, how to harden targets will change. And so we're constantly looking at the enemy and adjusting. And Iraq is dangerous, and it's dangerous because terrorists want us to leave. And we're not leaving."

I love this guy!

so, why do i think this is sinister not just stupid?...

Well, for as long as i can remember the term has always been suicide bombers, dont know about you but the bomb part of it seems pretty damn important to me.
to remove this key word is a way to take some of the horror from it, to distort the reality of it, its an attempt to change the way we refer to these people who blow themselves and countless others up.
I believe that by removing the bomber part, getting the term into common usage people will forget what is actually happening!

Devastation

lives literally torn apart

survivors with horrific injuries, limbs missing and permanent disfiguration..


suiciders? sounds soft in comparison, its "devastation light, with no added horror! available from the US gov and all news agencies now!"

please dont twist it, please dont distort the truth of language to make voters forget whats really happening... to lessen the severity.

maybe im wrong, maybe im right, but if I am right, i think we should all be sickened.

filakia
Mun


papyrina 51F
21133 posts
5/24/2006 6:09 am

Oowwww what a nice new word for destruction,as usual soften up reality,bombs don't kill or maim


I'm a

and
i'm here to stay


mundarikos 40M
423 posts
5/25/2006 3:53 am

thanks you too!
filakia
mun


idoljane 43F
117 posts
5/26/2006 2:35 am

I saw the reporting too but didnt pick up on the word.
euharisto mun

IJ


shadeofpink 42F

5/27/2006 2:00 pm

I SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!!!!!!!!!!!!! That isn't saying i support Bush....that little xerox copy?


mundarikos 40M
423 posts
5/29/2006 5:48 am

    Quoting shadeofpink:
    I SUPPORT OUR TROOPS!!!!!!!!!!!!! That isn't saying i support Bush....that little xerox copy?
i think the supporting of your troops is a wonderful thing and i would never suggest someone shouldnt...
my question is this:
what is the best way to support them? fight for them to come home and stop dying in an illegal war or to offer them words of support while they risk and lose their lives for something that has nothing to do with protecting their homeland?
filakia
mun


rm_mukaz3 40M
1 post
6/19/2006 2:04 am

Nice view


Become a member to create a blog