Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire!  

curious311241 34M
190 posts
1/20/2006 9:39 pm

Last Read:
3/5/2006 9:27 pm

Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire!

One of my favorite pastimes is looking to see who is online in my local area. This search is for women, couples (FF or MF), or groups looking for men in my area. I then compare these findings to those who have IMC and are online locally in hopes that those using IMC locally are actually looking for men, since it is my only way of contacting people on this site. I've had maybe 3 or four instances that I've been able to find this match. Of course my IM's were ignored, but you gotta at least try right?

Anyway, through looking at the locals online, I've become familiar with the "regulars" who are online at the same time as me. I've also come to suspect some people that I believe are fakes. Seriously, take a look at Sable7986shankin and Sassy_babe77280. I mean, c'mon. At least make a meager effort to make yourself look real.

I've also come to the conclusion that Windsor Locks (CT) has a brothel because of the disproportionate number of hot 20somethings that seem to reside in that town, and always seem to be online. OK, the brothel might be a stretch, but there's definitely something a little shady doing down there. I grew up Suffield, Windsor Locks' big rival in high school sports, and there is absolutely no reason for the amount of "active profiles" from this town in comparison to the rest of the state. At the time time of polling, almost 20% of those online looking for men were from Windsor Locks, which is a small podunk town. I just don't buy it. (New Haven seems to have a lot too, but that makes sense in my head since its a (small) city and people actually live there.)

Also, when I first started on this site, I decided that I wouldn't be able to trust those who did not post a picture of some sort. But since so many of the fakes seem to post pictures, I've reversed that opinion, and I think I would actually trust people who don't have a picture more than those that do.

Thats my rant for the locals tonight. Anyone else have thoughts on this?

curious311241 34M
145 posts
1/21/2006 10:32 am

I found another example. ez301flirt and ezone6498. If anyone else knows of any others that blatantly look fake (the least you can do is change the picture), feel free to post them.

mangomamiCT 41F

1/23/2006 7:23 pm

I trust people more without a pic than with a pic , because they may be hesitant about being "spotted" the fake shots make me wonder whats the point?

curious311241 34M
145 posts
1/23/2006 9:42 pm

I was actually guessing that it would be the other way around for women. Since there are so many guys on this site, I would tend to think that a women's physical preferences would be important (along with verification in a photo) in choosing someone you would/could potentially meet. Unless of course the men on this site struggle greatly in the honosty in their photos.

NSAAddict 42F

1/24/2006 1:08 pm

I think you're right Curious, they sure look fake to me. I also think you're onto something with the no pic posted = real thing. I know I didn't post one for the longest time because I didn't want to be found on here, and even now it will always be just chest shots. I've had people I know get recognized and it's caused havoc for them. Good luck weeding out the fakes and finding someone real!

curious311241 34M
145 posts
1/28/2006 12:52 pm

More fakers hot_diva188 and [hot_diva1880]

Become a member to create a blog