Why Hasn't Anyone Arrested This Woman?  

MissAnnThrope 56F
11679 posts
7/20/2006 12:44 pm

Last Read:
7/31/2008 10:17 pm

Why Hasn't Anyone Arrested This Woman?

Ann "cuntscab" Coulter is at it again. Someone who loves to inform people her books make it to the top of the NY Times bestseller list and whose publisher takes out full page ads in said paper, should NOT be pulling this crap.

Last week, the NY Times received an envelope containing an Xed out editorial and white powder. It wasn't anthrax, it turned out to be corn starch. Well, we all know the comments she's made about the paper. How Timothy McVeigh should have blown it up and how Bill Keller should be taken out and shot.

Well, someone from the NY Times asked after the anthrax scare, "This thing makes all of Ann Coulter's comments a little less funny. I wonder if she considers herself at all responsible when lunatics read her columns and she says that we should be killed."

So, Jacob Bernstein of Women's Wear Daily, of all publications, wrote to her AOL address, posing that question. This was the reply he got:

"So glad to hear that The New York Times got my letter and that your friend at the Times thinks I'm funny," she wrote back. "Good luck in journalism and please send me your home address so we can stay in touch, too.

"P.S. If we get hit again, don't forget to ask the NYT if they consider themselves responsible since they have repeatedly exposed classified government programs designed to prevent another terrorist attack."

What the hell is wrong with this woman? If any of us made a quip like this, the feds would be slapping the handcuffs on us so fast, it wouldn't be funny. We would be guilty until proven innocent. But this whore from the deepest depths of Hell says it and it's supposed to be funny?

Is anyone going to hold her responsible should some wingnut get the idea that since no one chastises her about this crap, that they have the blessings of the American public to blow up the NY Times? Or that no one will arrest them, because hypocritcal Neo-Cons think the place should be blown up? Hey, why not blow up MSNBC and CNN too, as they're also considered the liberal media by all these Fox News, I'll swallow any pill that doesn't make me think and supports my hate and distrust for anyone different assholes? Is she going to get on TV if this happens and tell us all how more is to come if we don't succumb to the thought police?

Which is another thing. She advocates terrorism with her words and then tries to dismiss what she says as a joke. Anti-War students are spied on by the NSA as potential terrorists. Vegan groups are being spied on, Catholic charity groups, etc. So why isn't this woman being considered a potential terrorist and being spied on and investigated?

You know, she reminds me of someone. Hell, she doesn't just remind me of him, they're cut from the same cloth. Someone just as hypocritical as she is. Someone so nutty, someone so extreme, that even the Reagan White House wanted him gone. They got him on conspiracy, mail fraud and income tax evasion. His name? Lyndon LaRouche.


DIVISION77 39M  
8321 posts
7/20/2006 1:28 pm

I saw Keith Olbermann (MSNBC's Countdown) talking about this situation with Ann Coulter.

It's nothing new.

She's all about shock value, more than substance.

She's not really a neo-con either, more a celebrity than anything.

When she runs for a major office and wins something, then I'll consider her a politician.

DIV

"My every move is a calculated step, to bring me closer to embrace an early death." -Tupac Shakur


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/20/2006 8:11 pm:
She's the media darling of the Neo-Cons. Div, you really do have to visit Free Republic sometime and take a look at how many people believe every word out of her mouth. This is what makes her scary.

rm_connor696 60M
834 posts
7/20/2006 1:38 pm

Damn, it's like telepathy. As I read this, I was thinking about LaRouche, and then you go and mention him!

I first encountered LaRouche's minions when I was just a wee lad (okay, about twenty-one). I and my girlfriend at the time found ourselves in the Boston airport, and there were these people with pro-nuclear energy signs. Just for laughs, we copped some carboard and made a one-eyed smiley face sign that read "Mutants for Nuclear Power." We expected a chuckle or perhaps some gentle derision when we went to stand next to them, but instead they launched into some seriously hate-filled insults, stuff like "What's that smell? Oh, it's must be that whore's rotten cunt" and (from a German guy no less) "I don't know whether he's a faggot or a Jew, but Hitler would have known what to do with him." I think my jaw actually dropped, I was so stunned. Later I was telling some friends about the episode and one of them hipped me to LaRouch and his crazy-ass followers.

But you know what's really scary about Coulter? Her books do sell. And she gets airtime. Fuck, you and I are giving her coverage here. You know what I'd like to see? Ann Coulter on the Daily Show, and Jon Stewart with the gloves off. Oh, yeah, I'd like that a lot.


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/20/2006 8:40 pm:
I think we all had our first exposure to the LaRouche people in airports. I was with friends, picking up a mutual friend at Newark Airport, who was coming home from vacation in 1979. They had all the "Nuke the Whales" and the Pope and Jimmy Carter were drug dealers, etc. I was shocked that anyone could be that ignorant. When I got home and told my parents and sister about them, they had all heard of Lyndon LaRouche and were amazed I hadn't. Well, if you keep withholding information from your own daughter...!

After that, I actually became fascinated with his insanity. I actually tried to watch his half hour of free time on the networks, more than once. Tried. I never got past the first five minutes. But I put him in the same loony classification as Jack Chick. Ann Coulter now joins them.

What is scary about Coulter is, while people don't take LaRouche seriously, something has been added to the water in the past ten years, I swear. All the people who buy her books hang onto every word and preach it like it's gospel. That is what's scary.

AS far as airtime, I would love to see her on The Colbert Report. See how long it takes her to realize he's not a real conservative and she's being made fun of.

TechSteve 49M

7/20/2006 2:41 pm

If it is not illegal, it is in bad taste.

In Canada, I have no idea what the laws are when it comes to this kind of stuff.

Hate speech is a crime in Canada. Canada has brought people to justice for speaking out against certain races of people at public gatherings in the last couple of years.

My point is if you encourage this kind of reckless behavior, such as blowing up a temple or a news outlet, and if you have a following, I would think you would get in some legal trouble in Canada.

Steve


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/20/2006 8:43 pm:
Oh, under the Patriot Act and various hate crime laws, it's incredibly illegal. Just like her voter fraud in Florida. Excuse me. Alleged voter fraud, the investigation is still going.

Hate speech is a crime here too. She should get in trouble, but it's ok for her to say someone should poison a judge's creme brulee, or that a Congressman should be fragged, etc.

She should be in some serious legal trouble here too. But she's on the side of the current administration, so she can say anything she wants, while advocating the deaths of those who say what she doesn't like.

rm_kelli4u2dew 41F
5220 posts
7/20/2006 2:57 pm

You know as well as I do that the neo-cons don't even pretend to give lip service to the Constitution. It's more comfortable to think of Coulter as a shock-value celebrity, but when you think that Cheney and Rove and Wolfowitz are absolute advocates of Machiavelli, and Orwell's 1984 ... there are people in this country who would welcome a fascist autocracy as long as they're the ones at the top.


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/20/2006 8:46 pm:
Oh, you mean they're supposed to honor the Constitution? Hey, now that the Bill of Rights has all but been blown to hell in the name of safety for the masses, they're free to pick away at the articles of the Constitution too.

AstirRelicLatah 64M
1993 posts
7/20/2006 3:04 pm

The Neo Con's with Coulter leading the way work with impunity. They have completely cowed the media. If she's held responsible, oh that's right Neo Con's haven't figure out how to spell that word, they will immediately should bad "Liberal Media".

Actually the media isn't liberal at all. It's all owned by large organizations that have a huge investment in the status quo. They secretly love what Coulter and her ilk are doing. We don't have a liberal media in this country, we just have some outlets that allow an alternate opinion to appear every once in a while.


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/20/2006 8:50 pm:
No kidding the media is owned by giant corporations. I've never viewed the media as liberal. But when they call someone on the right on their shit, they're suddenly liberals. Are they right wingers too, when they blast someone on the left? Nope. Only Fox News and a few papers like World Net Daily and the Washington Times, which is owned by Rev. Moon have that distinction.

cuteNEway 41F

7/20/2006 3:55 pm

I think she gets away with it because she's thin and blond. Had it been an ugly fat dude he'da been in jail a looooonnnnngggggggg time ago...


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/20/2006 8:51 pm:
OK cute, get over this fat and ugly thing. You know that's not true for two reasons... Rush Limbaugh and Karl Rove. They're both scot-free after committing crimes that they advocate hanging others for.

NickRules999 39M
9462 posts
7/20/2006 4:20 pm

I have to wonder....is Ann Coulter really a man in drag?

Come into my realm! You aren't afraid...are you?


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/20/2006 8:52 pm:
You're not the only one. There are people out there who call her "Man Coulter." I personally think she was born a hermaphrodite and they did gender assignment surgery on her as a baby. And they picked the wrong gender, as turning a hermaphrodite to a woman is a hell of a lot easier than to a man. Especialy 45 years ago.

sweetSinn2690
2943 posts
7/20/2006 5:32 pm

    Quoting NickRules999:
    I have to wonder....is Ann Coulter really a man in drag?
I have to wonder if she's not here on AdultFriendFinder...you know, one of those newbie shit disturbers here?

She'll cross the line one too many times and they will nab her...
they should have already!


Oh WHATEVER BITCHES!


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/20/2006 8:55 pm:
She wouldn't last a week before her coke ravaged ass was chased off, or she picked up some guy who couldn't wait to tell everyone in the chat room that he just fucked Ann Coulter and this is her handle, boys.

rm_AnOddGirl 57F
3469 posts
7/20/2006 9:01 pm

Gawd, I intently dislike this woman. How the fuck she manages to stay alive is beyond me!!!


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/20/2006 9:46 pm:
Well, there is a site that claims she stays alive by bathing in the blood of virgin Neo-Cons, who line up to donate. I'm amazed she hasn't ODed or drunk herself to death yet.

OboesHonedIambs 62F

7/20/2006 9:32 pm

"So, Jacob Bernstein of Women's Wear Daily, of all publications, wrote to her AOL address, posing that question. This was the reply he got:

"So glad to hear that The New York Times got my letter and that your friend at the Times thinks I'm funny," she wrote back. "Good luck in journalism and please send me your home address so we can stay in touch, too.

"P.S. If we get hit again, don't forget to ask the NYT if they consider themselves responsible since they have repeatedly exposed classified government programs designed to prevent another terrorist attack." "

I PRAY those are cuntscab's fingerprints on that envelope, too!

Instant Human -- Just Add Coffee


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/20/2006 9:47 pm:
Oh, I pray they can place her in Philly when it was mailed, that it's her handwriting and her fingerprints. I am hoping against hope. I'm also waiting to see if the NY Times is ever going to comment on this.

rm_macallan4u 46M
968 posts
7/20/2006 10:39 pm

At least she doesn't get up here in Canada. Unfortunately, we do get LaRouche cooks spreading there message on street corners. It drives me crazy seeing people unknowingly stop to pick up the info! Great post, I was unaware of her reply, thx


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/21/2006 9:07 pm:
That's because no one will interview her up there. She was even interviwed by the BBC last month. They're trying to call her the Republican Michael Moore.

I didn't know the LaRouche people were still around. I would have thought by now, they would have entered the wonderful world of Neo-Connism (I just made that up.) to try to bring about the end of the world.

rm_kelli4u2dew 41F
5220 posts
7/20/2006 11:23 pm

MissAnnThrope replies on 7/20/2006 9:46 pm:
Oh, you mean they're supposed to honor the Constitution? Hey, now that the Bill of Rights has all but been blown to hell in the name of safety for the masses, they're free to pick away at the articles of the Constitution too.


One of the best jokes I've seen was about writing the Iraqi constitution: "Why don't we give them ours? We're not using it anyway."

Hon, I really wish you'd quit beating around the shrub and tell us what you really think ...


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/21/2006 9:13 pm:
I love that joke! I haven't heard it before.

I would say what I really think, but then the NSA will start monitoring my Internet activity. Which means, they'll start investigating everyone here. So, I hold back.

sillyperv 54M

7/21/2006 8:16 am

A neo con being held responsible for what they've said and done - that would be a first.

As appalling as I find their views, it's the inate hatred of mankind, and I suspect themselves, that most neocons exude that distrubs me. They are "scorched earthers" - if they go, they'll take everyone else with them. Lets hope the world doesn't get any more crazy.


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/21/2006 9:18 pm:
Yeah, I keep forgetting, it's only Democrats who are supposed to be held accountable, as the meaning of GOP has changed to God's Own Party.

I personally think 90% of the general population are comprised of air thievs. However, I'm not out to nuke the planet, in the name of some religious movement that didn't exist until the mid 1800s. I just wouldn't let the air thieves overbreed. However, Neo-Cons don't even believe in birth control, but want to bring about the end of the world. I just don't get that.

MillsShipsGayly 51M

7/21/2006 8:34 am

She really should get what she deserves ....

silence ... no publicity ... irrelvance ...

She just eats up the controversy and is laughing all the way to the bank.


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/21/2006 9:21 pm:
She'd get no publicity if she wasn't so outrageous. Michelle Malkin is just as looney, but she doesn't insist on making such outrageous claims and once in a while, has a rare moment of lucidity. So she doesn't get half the publicity.

The more Coulter acts like a lunatic, I'm hoping the less people will care. Except for those as looney as she is.

readytolay_3
(What the fuck is this shit..?? *rolls eyes*)
105F

7/21/2006 7:05 pm

Thinning out the herd is just LONG over due....Ready

Ready


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/21/2006 9:21 pm:
Oh, you'll get no argument from me there.

rm_AnOddGirl 57F
3469 posts
7/22/2006 9:41 am

What, isn't she dead yet? MissAnn, your slipping! Do ya need a donation for the hitman?!?!


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/26/2006 1:00 pm:
Why bother with a hitman when she's self-destructing so nicely? Between alcoholism, drug abuse and anorexia, I'll be amazed if she makes it to 50.

concupiscentKid 40M

7/25/2006 2:51 pm

Do a google and check out how she twisted the research on the
peppered moth.

She's just an idiot.
The scary thing is all the people who take her seriously (and they vote)


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/26/2006 1:02 pm:
Well, of course she's an idiot. She swallows and forces down the throat of the public anything the religious right says. She's made a fortune off of 9/11, but begrudges the families of the victims a cent. She's a royal cuntscab.

The people who take her seriously are beyond hope and in a perfect world, they'd all be sterile.

NoGlory777

7/27/2006 5:28 am

Coulter is simply the poster child of the current breed of ill-mannered, ill-tempered, apologists for a political philosophy that long ago lost its luster. Unfortunately, the current crop continues to have its devoted followers and so she can write her books and make her tv appearances..vitriol and all..
To turn one old conservative back on her and her ilk I can only turn to Spiro Agnew, who had more bite and better vocabulary:
"A spirit of national masochism prevails, encouraged by an effete corps of impudent snobs who characterize themselves as intellectuals"
Coulter and her ilk are a cancer on the landscape, but don't they do more harm than good to their various causes by being so ridiculous?


MissAnnThrope replies on 7/27/2006 12:09 pm:
Of course they do more harm than good. They claim to tell the real truth, but they actually do their best to taint. They scream about the liberal media, but as pointed out above, there is no such thing, as 99% of media outlets are owned by large conglomerates.

It just goes to show how easily people are willing to be led. To allow others to do their thinking for them. It happens on the other side too.

As far as the current crop goes... They kind of make Agnew's income tax evasion look like pre-school stuff, don't they?

Become a member to create a blog