Are Gang Bangs Good or Perversions? (Yes, this is very philosophic)  

7inchlinguest 61M
14 posts
8/14/2005 6:26 pm

Last Read:
5/7/2013 11:24 pm

Are Gang Bangs Good or Perversions? (Yes, this is very philosophic)


If the definition of perversion is anything that goes against nature, well the truth is that women having gang bangs is in actuality part of nature, so it can't be "perverted". After all, biology supports such activities, and the desire to do so exists as well. A species of primates called the Bonobo Chimpanzee, which is our closest genetic cousin, behave in a similar manner as the above. Females can mate with well over 50 to 100 males in a cycle.This behavior is considered patently "offensive" to some. But,the idea of what is perverted is a culturally subjective idea. Some of the older pre-civilized cultures had very different ideas of human sexuality than civilized societies of the last 5000 yrs. Much isn't known of these societies because they were either exterminated, enslaved, or "Christianized" by the more powerful empires that sweped the world. But I digress..

I would argue that our system of sexual mores are in reality malevolent and a true perversion of nature. The reason I say this is that so much of our "moral" tradition is about restraining and regulating sexuality-especially female sexuality! In a book by Daniel Amnius, which is a defense of our system, he actually has a chapter called "The Patriarchal System: Putting Sex to Work" the premise is that civilization is possible only by regulating female sexuality and "making men work for sex"(ugh!). Now, how any reasonable thinking normal man would think "Yeh this is good!" is almost beyond me. Of course, he states that restricting the ability of women to pursue their own economic interest and making them dependant on men is a major puzzle piece in the equation. So, in other words, our system is based on the premise that sex be regulated, and that the principle of scarcity be implemented, and that women, at least until recently , being economically dependant, essentially have to "sell" sex for security. I would call that a dual power pincer for human misery, and, even worse yet, has contributed to exponential population growth and the Earth of it's resources (nomadic human populations were stable for much of the last 100,000 yrs, with most of the growth since the emergence of civilization. I would recommend a book by William Kotkie called "The Final Empire", which is a wealth of information on this topic, and even touches on the subject of sexual mores in imperial societies. A very benevolent book, the exact opposite of books written by people like George Gilder, Daniel Amnius, Dr(?) Laura, Rush Limbaugh and the other clowns out there).
The above being reinforced by calling women who peruse sexual pleasure outside of marriage "whores" "sluts" while at the same time having few if any social sanctions against men who do the same, has the effect of re-enforcing the "scarcity" principle, and denying the natural desires of the women who would freely pursue gratification if it wasn't for , as I would state, our perverted, anti-nature, anti-human, malevolent system of sexual mores.

So, in conclusion, I'd say women pursuing their natural tendencies, whether to engineering "gang bangs" "group fucks" or what have you, can be powerful instigators to help hasten the collapse of our system of sexual mores which are clearly unnatural and perverse.

So, based on what I have written, what would you say? Good or Perverse?

7inchlinguest 61M
35 posts
9/16/2005 2:46 am

Morals and guilt are part of social programming,and usually come from some external authority. The ideas of morality are actually ethno-centric. The Victorian age differed from ancient Rome and many of the Polynisian societies. To a great extent, religion gives "morality" a mystical power that tends to make it beyond question, for it is infered that questioning religious tenants could result in "damnation". A brilliant, though non-consious mechanism to isolate such concepts from questioning,at least in earlier less enlighted ages.


rm_beturgood 59F
5 posts
10/25/2006 10:14 pm

Wow, thats quite a wordy blog you have there.
Go outside would ya!


7inchlinguest 61M
35 posts
12/3/2006 7:04 pm

Yeh! I do, but I like to take my computer with me!

Hey, what can I say, I think things through pretty well and I can do this in my head as I am going about my day...running, working out, hiking, even working at certain tasks that require little or no conscious thought to do..

Well, can't think about some of these things while having sex, or else it would take forever.


rm_bojo681 55M
46 posts
9/9/2007 1:17 am

good, it's about like religion or politics, all f'd up.


audicpl 50M/50F

12/21/2007 6:32 pm

We agree with you wholeheartedly, 7inchlinquest -- it's GOOD for a woman to want groupfucks as you call them (nice term, btw; we like it)! Nice essay.


seeya690 58M/59F  
51 posts
6/7/2012 8:13 am

We think they are just plain old good perversions.


jayberdz2
101 posts
12/1/2012 3:58 pm

As long as everyone is ok with pure sex there morally ok. When I play at gangbangs or with adult theater sluts I check her pussy, if its wet she is into it, if shes dry she is there just to please hubby. I don't play with girls who aren't there to have fun for themselves.


7inchlinguest replies on 5/7/2013 11:26 pm:
The lady should be into it for sure!

I have taken lady friends to the theater who have had a great time, gone home happy, and have invited me to thier home for more!

Become a member to create a blog