Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
If the email is registered with our site, you will receive an email with instructions to reset your password. Password reset link sent to:
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service

Member Deleted Post  

posts

Member Deleted Post


This post has been deleted by

Travel_Couple69 58M
1604 posts
6/2/2015 7:09 am

Been on this site for over 10 years and it has evolved quite a bit. Part of the problem that with all the divergent and incompatible ideas of what is this site for, is that the parent company has created this Frankenstein of a social/dating/sex/porn/swinger/blogging amalgam of interests.

As the net grew and more similar sites appeared, the larger companies, penthouse - this site owner, began buying them up, shutting them down while opening up broader features on this site - a catch all - there is way more pay for porn, way more blog features and way more chat systems than were originally....they know they need women to get the guys in to churn the revenue...guys are the biggest revenue...though the system has enough free features, but only to tease you into believing that one can really hook up here.

the problem this site is at now, is that it is nothing to everyone and folks are getting frustrated...and venting...constantly. Everyone seems to have some opinion, very strong, about how others should view them, interact with them, or not at all. Seems to us there is plenty of room for all different perspectives but everyone holds such a strong personal view....seems over the din we all want to see whom can drown out others opinions as well as reinforce our own. the blogs give this forum and soap box...hell we've done it too.

seems the top blog rants, in no particular order, cheaters are scum, men are scum, women dont put out, dick picks - yes/no, flakes, fakes and time wasters, whose real, where are the unicorns, why are you on this site, i have a right to be on this site....and so on.


FullOn4U 58M
20399 posts
6/2/2015 2:45 pm

Applying common sense to solve a problem based in irrationality? Can't see it working

I wonder at the complaints about cock shots - you join a site, see it's full of cock shots and think "Hmm, this is not for me" and leave. Or... you start up a blog to complain about the number of cocks forced upon you. And when it's suggested you use the filter the answer is "But I like to see some of them..."

The problem is basic - men do the asking, women do the choosing. This means men get to choose who they ask and women get to choose who they accept. There is no more point complaining about the men a woman attracts than there is complaining about the women who reject a man.

Things would be different (and indeed are different) if women ignore the emails they get and instead approach the men they like. The problem of "wanna fuck" emails vanishes, but at the risk of rejection and no longer getting all the attention - which explains why very few women do this.

Though I don't really mind women complaining about "wanna fuck" emails - I'm sure they get annoying pretty quickly. What really winds me up are the men who do all the "How to talk to women" posts - it's clear that they aren't directed at men at all, they are just there to reinforce his good guy credentials


Become a member to create a blog